From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext11.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Gm8of-0004Ko-T6 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:04:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] BLOCK_RO: Readonly Block Device Layer Over MTD From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Vitaly Wool In-Reply-To: <45619C60.7070400@ru.mvista.com> References: <20061117184055.569da7ad@localhost.localdomain> <1163855713.5597.70.camel@sauron> <1163856784.20835.2.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1163856955.5597.71.camel@sauron> <45619C60.7070400@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:46:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1164026819.5597.88.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kbaidarov Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 15:15 +0300, Vitaly Wool wrote: > B/c it introduces new fields in generic mtd structures which are already=20 > overcomplicated, and modifies a lot of generic code. I'd expect that=20 > with this patch applied stuff like mtdcore.c and mtdpart.c becomes=20 > exposed to possible licensing issues which is definitely not what we aim = ;-) I am talking about something like this: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2004-May/009683.html I do not see it introducing any new field. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)