From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext13.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GneB3-00038M-3R for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 11:45:31 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] NAND: Lazily BBT construction From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Vitaly Wool In-Reply-To: <4566EF6A.1000404@ru.mvista.com> References: <20061124154210.6303c9fe@localhost.localdomain> <1164373299.576.11.camel@sauron> <4566EF6A.1000404@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:42:24 +0200 Message-Id: <1164382944.576.16.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Konstantin Baydarov Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 16:11 +0300, Vitaly Wool wrote: > I was poking around this idea a bit and it turned out that the boot time=20 > is longer for most flashes. Why is it longer for most flashes? And longer with comparing to what? --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)