From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mgw-ext03.nokia.com ([131.228.20.95])
	by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1GplyM-000290-Mj
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:29:24 -0500
Subject: Re: performance of JFFS and YAFFS in terms of in-place updates
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: hyunggook.yoo@oracle.com
In-Reply-To: <456E9B4F.5080806@oracle.com>
References: <456E9B4F.5080806@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:28:51 +0200
Message-Id: <1164893331.576.70.camel@sauron>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 17:50 +0900, Howard Yoo wrote:
> we're testing the performance btw. JFFS and YAFFS, and we're currently
> using nand simulator to simulate the nand flash behavior (since we don't
> have the physical flash for our testing) on linux kernel 2.6.17.

Please, elaborate, this is JFFS or JFFS2? JFFS is almost dead.

--=20
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90=
=D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)