From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.173] helo=mgw-ext14.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GrvQl-0002KA-7L for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:59:21 -0500 Subject: Re: Finding flash type... From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Ricard Wanderlof In-Reply-To: References: <20061206014432.56808.qmail@web30201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1165370753.2679.5.camel@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:58:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1165406340.20337.48.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Linux mtd Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 09:31 +0100, Ricard Wanderlof wrote: > For NAND flash chips I think it would also be nice to get a list of bad=20 > blocks. This can be most useful when debugging. Yeah. Once sysfs support is there we could export many useful information without need to call these syscalls. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)