From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171] helo=mgw-ext12.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1H4yCR-0005AF-91 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:34:30 -0500 Subject: Re: max_ec value is shown as 1 From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Sandeep Kumar In-Reply-To: <37d33d830701110322x5f60ec88r17b0cdd562ec8d4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <37d33d830701110244m58afec33hcf77323e4dc550f3@mail.gmail.com> <1168512581.26936.33.camel@sauron> <37d33d830701110322x5f60ec88r17b0cdd562ec8d4b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:34:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1168515248.26936.36.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 16:52 +0530, Sandeep Kumar wrote: > I got it, I think. I mistook this value as the maximum erase count for > a leb on that device. And thats why I was surprised. Maximum LEB EC is 0x7FFFFFFF (31 bit) in current implementation. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)