From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HA8Rf-00058y-4B for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:31:33 -0500 Subject: Re: What is ANAND header? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <1169744138.3593.114.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> References: <20070124054731.GA31267@pooky.senux.com> <20070125064937.GA5712@pooky.senux.com> <1169716358.3609.12.camel@sauron> <1169739059.3593.84.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <1169740653.3721.10.camel@sauron> <1169741859.3593.102.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <1169743487.9477.4.camel@sauron> <1169744138.3593.114.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:31:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1169746272.9477.7.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Seongsu Lee Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 00:55 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Agree, an FS is a much more interesting problem. Although a good FTL is > > is something which would be nice to have. >=20 > Not really. If we had a well-maintained FTL then people would only use > it. :) Heh, users are morons and they would use inefficient FTL instead of JFFS2, so having an FTL is bad - good point :-) --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)