From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HAMH6-0002N3-Ao for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 03:17:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [MTD] UBI: Per volume update marker From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Alexander Schmidt In-Reply-To: <200701241019.27470.alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <200701241019.27470.alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:04:24 +0200 Message-Id: <1169798664.9477.21.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Alexander, On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 10:19 +0100, Alexander Schmidt wrote: > I am currently implementing a per volume update marker for UBI. > It would be nice to know if you are interested in this feature and if you > have remarks about my concept. One remark about the patch: you did not update commentaries. For example, the header commentary in upd.h. Let's keep commentaries up-to-date please. I'd suggest you to grep for "update" and "marker", carefully look at the results, and fix/update if needed. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)