From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HAOhy-0003fm-CV for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 05:53:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [MTD] UBI: Per volume update marker From: Artem Bityutskiy To: haver@vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <1169801265.4389.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200701241019.27470.alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1169748994.9477.15.camel@sauron> <1169801265.4389.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:43:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1169808209.9477.25.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Alexander Schmidt , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:47 +0100, Frank Haverkamp wrote: > The simplest form of our boot-loader does not know anything about the > volume table and update maker block at all, but just deals with static > volumes. If all blocks of a static volumes are available and have good > CRC the boot-code will use it. OK, fine with me. > Alexander will update the patch according to the comments you gave in > your last mail and resend the patch. Sure, thanks. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)