From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134] helo=mail.tglx.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HCbhH-00076g-34 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:09:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/1] [MTD] UBI: implement per-volume update From: Thomas Gleixner To: Artem Bityutskiy In-Reply-To: <20070201102111.15629.24289.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070201102105.15629.61206.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070201102111.15629.24289.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:10:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1170335439.29240.277.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Schmidt , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 12:21 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > This patch removes the global update marker support and everything > related to it. Now we have per-volume update marker bit in the > volume table. This makes us incompatible with older UBI images but > this is not a big deal - UBI is not used so widely so far and we > can afford dropping legacy stuff now. Uuurgh. Incompatible in what way ? Does this mean you cannot boot from an existing image anymore ? tglx