Re: [PATCH] UBI: introduce sequential counter

Artem Bityutskiy
2007-02-09T14:56:01Z

On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 08:50 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Having them generate a unique number for seqnum isn't _required_ though
> right? UBI will see them all as 0 and still work if I understand
> correctly.

Yes. I is not required to be done immediately. But in order to be able
to smoothly remove legacy stuff, it should be done better sooner then
later.

--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)