From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: brijesh.singh@calsoftinc.com
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.s.singh@gmail.com>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Why is PEB not erased before writing???
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:44:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171968259.30834.229.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44602.172.16.0.34.1171964998.squirrel@webmail.calsoftinc.com>
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 15:19 +0530, brijesh.singh@calsoftinc.com wrote:
> > Applications and UBI kernel users have no access to physical erase
> > blocks. They look at logical erase blocks. UBI manages the translation
> > of logical to physical blocks. If you write to the same logical erase
> > block again UBI will just write to a different physical erase block and
> > erase the previous PEB later on. The internal management guarantees that
> > the application looks only at the newest written block and not at the
> > older one.
>
> Yes this is what I thought it should do.If LEB is mapped to a dirty PEB
> remap it and wl daemon will erase it.But it doesn't.
> But here is the scenario
> Steps
> *I made a 2MB ubi volume
> *Total mtd device size is 3MB
> *I wrote a 2MB file to UBI using "dd if=file of=/dev/ubi_vol"
> *Now device is full
> *Again I did the same thing.
> *Now theoretically erase should have been called,by wl or eba module
> *But it directly over-writes the device.
> I am using mtdram to test if erase is called.Nop,it is not.
> Cdev write interface calls eba_write which doesn't check if block is
> already written.And it over-writes it with no call to erase.
> Now what to do?Erase is not even called!
Did you enable CONFIG_MTD_USERSPACE_IO ? If yes, then the behaviour is
clear. This is a _DEBUG_ option and bypasses the normal update
procedure.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-20 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-20 6:37 Why is PEB not erased before writing??? Brijesh Singh
2007-02-20 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-20 9:49 ` brijesh.singh
2007-02-20 10:44 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-02-20 11:08 ` Brijesh Singh
2007-02-20 11:11 ` Brijesh Singh
2007-02-20 11:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-20 21:48 ` Gavin Lambert
2007-02-20 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1171968259.30834.229.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=brijesh.s.singh@gmail.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@calsoftinc.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox