From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com
Cc: ext Alexander Schmidt <alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Frank Haverkamp <haver@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] UBI: rewrite of sysfs.c
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:25:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1174083917.13341.310.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45F6D46C.8030100@nokia.com>
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 18:42 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Alexander Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I rewrote the sysfs interface to use struct device instead of struct
> > class_device. This implies an interface change, as sysfs files are now
> > ordered in a different manner:
> >
> > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/ for device files
> > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX_Y/ for volumes
> >
> > Before we had
> >
> > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/ for device files
> > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/Y/ for volumes
> >
> > Please let me know if you got any objections on this or if you have
> > proposals for a better implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Schmidt <alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> It seems we cannot preserve old sysfs structure...
>
> It is fine with me. You and Thomas are the main users, so if it is ok
> with you - lets' apply this.
No objections. I will hack^Wscript my way around it and silently curse
at you :)
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-16 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-13 15:10 [RFC] [PATCH] UBI: rewrite of sysfs.c Alexander Schmidt
2007-03-13 16:38 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-03-13 16:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-03-14 8:24 ` Frank Haverkamp
2007-03-14 8:32 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-03-16 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2007-03-14 9:23 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1174083917.13341.310.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=haver@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox