From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134] helo=mail.tglx.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HSKkm-0000fi-QV for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:18:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] UBI: rewrite of sysfs.c From: Thomas Gleixner To: Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com In-Reply-To: <45F6D46C.8030100@nokia.com> References: <200703131610.20161.alexs@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <45F6D46C.8030100@nokia.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:25:17 +0100 Message-Id: <1174083917.13341.310.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ext Alexander Schmidt , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Frank Haverkamp Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 18:42 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Alexander Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I rewrote the sysfs interface to use struct device instead of struct > > class_device. This implies an interface change, as sysfs files are now > > ordered in a different manner: > > > > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/ for device files > > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX_Y/ for volumes > > > > Before we had > > > > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/ for device files > > /sys/class/ubi/ubiX/Y/ for volumes > > > > Please let me know if you got any objections on this or if you have > > proposals for a better implementation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Schmidt > > It seems we cannot preserve old sysfs structure... > > It is fine with me. You and Thomas are the main users, so if it is ok > with you - lets' apply this. No objections. I will hack^Wscript my way around it and silently curse at you :) tglx