From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HUNHm-0002MY-Jd for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:24:59 -0400 Subject: Re: JFFS2 SUMMARY nodes aren't working From: Artem Bityutskiy To: joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se In-Reply-To: <1174569321.26465.308.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se> References: <1174569321.26465.308.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:24:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1174569884.17249.227.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:15 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On a fresh JFFS2 root FS image with summary nodes there is no > difference in mount time when enabling summary support in kernel(2.6.20, > powerpc). I would suggest to CC Ferenc Havasi --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)