From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nat-132.atmel.no ([80.232.32.132] helo=relay.atmel.no) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Hm5p2-0006qY-Cr for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 06:24:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Problems with cfi_cmdset_0002 and Atmel AT49BV642D From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt To: Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= In-Reply-To: References: <1178718379.11554.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1178781348.11554.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070510102703.04a398ee@dhcp-252-105.norway.atmel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 12:24:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1178792655.11554.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Haavard Skinnemoen List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Michael König wrote: > > So if you have the patch available, now would probably be a good time > > to post it ;-) > > Unfortunately I don't have any experience with GIT and also don't have the > time to set it up right now, but I'm attaching a "diff -p" for the changes > to the latest cfi_cmdset_0002.c in the repository. Ah, very similar to the patch I posted against 2.6.20. The email is held for approval for some reason, but this patch will do the same. Only difference is that I put fixup_convert_atmel_pri on the top, since none of the other fixups should read anything from an Atmel device CFI information before it has been corrected. -- With kind regards, Hans-Christian Egtvedt, siv.ing. (M.Sc.) Applications Engineer - AVR32 System Solutions - Atmel Norway