From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HtPCJ-0006Xa-Ss for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:30:50 -0400 Subject: Re: Open message to list moderator From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Phil Endecott In-Reply-To: <1180477810115@dmwebmail.belize.chezphil.org> References: <1180477810115@dmwebmail.belize.chezphil.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:30:37 +0300 Message-Id: <1180535437.24399.6.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 23:30 +0100, Phil Endecott wrote:=20 > Dear Moderator, >=20 > You have just rejected a message that I sent on Sunday. This message=20 > provided background information to the patch that I sent at about the=20 > same time (and which was accepted). Phil, apologies, I had to look closer and noticed that this was the first message with this subject and do not select reject. It was late, there were many messages, I wanted to go home quicker, I was hungry, tired, and so on, you know :-) > Now, you have lost the explanation for the patch and have annoyed me=20 > enough that I am unlikely to go out of my way to fix any further=20 > problems that I spot in your code. Was this really worth it just for a=20 > missing header? But this really is childish to be miffed like this. Take it easier. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)