From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HzsrG-000715-8f for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 07:23:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Current status of UBI From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Your Name In-Reply-To: <200705311027.l4VARGmG023819@jesus.no-ip.org> References: <200705311027.l4VARGmG023819@jesus.no-ip.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:23:44 +0300 Message-Id: <1182079424.4403.11.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jacky Lam Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 18:27 +0800, Your Name wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Sorry, I miss the 2.6.22-rc3 tree. Now I can see that. But it=20 > doesn't contain ubifs. Is that mean ubifs is not stable enough to work=20 > with? >=20 Yes, ubifs is still being developed. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)