From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171] helo=mgw-ext12.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1IIom0-0006je-MF for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:53:59 -0400 Subject: Re: LogFS take five From: Artem Bityutskiy To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel In-Reply-To: <20070808163545.GU15319@lazybastard.org> References: <20070808161234.GB15319@lazybastard.org> <1186590437.19606.38.camel@sauron> <20070808163545.GU15319@lazybastard.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:52:00 +0300 Message-Id: <1186591920.19606.45.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 18:35 +0200, J=C3=B6rn Engel wrote: > Scanning. I don't have seperate accounting yet. Ok, but how are you going to implement it? Surely you cannot say that LogFS is scalable before you have better space accounting (or you at least should note that it is scalable up to some limit). --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)