From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nwd2mail10.analog.com ([137.71.25.55]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ISP25-00080M-OL for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:24:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin BF54x NAND Flash Controller driver From: Bryan Wu To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0709031057u1f4608f6y36bd20a8f6910a32@mail.gmail.com> References: <1188804323.29566.6.camel@roc-laptop> <8bd0f97a0709031057u1f4608f6y36bd20a8f6910a32@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 11:21:49 +0800 Message-Id: <1188876109.6319.9.camel@roc-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: bryan.wu@analog.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse , akpm@linux-foundation.org Reply-To: bryan.wu@analog.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 13:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 9/3/07, Bryan Wu wrote: > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Kconfig > > @@ -131,6 +131,24 @@ config MTD_NAND_AU1550 > > +config MTD_NAND_BF54X > > + tristate "NAND Flash support for Blackfin BF54X SoC DSP" > > i'd just describe it as "Blackfin on-chip NAND" rather than sticking > in exact part numbers as i imagine we can extend it down the line > > > + This enables the NAND flash controller on the BF54X SoC DPSs > > "BF54X SoC DPSs" -> "BF54x SoC DSPs" > > > + No board specific support is done by this driver, each board > > + must advertise a platform_device for the driver to attach. > > should mention the module name when built as a module > I will get rid of this BF54X and use BF5XX for (BF54x and BF52x and future processor) > > +config MTD_NAND_BF54X_HWECC > > + bool "BF54X NAND Hardware ECC" > > + depends on MTD_NAND_BF54X > > + help > > + Enable the use of the BF54X's internal ECC generator when > > + using NAND. Early versions of the chip have had problems with > > + incorrect ECC generation, and if using these, the default of > > + software ECC is preferable. > > rather than advertising this, i'd just keep it in the driver ... > presumably there are anomaly #'s for when the ECC is wrong, so we can > make the code depend on those > -mike This option is quite common in the NAND driver. If there are anomaly #'s, code can still depend on those by using hardware_ecc varible. This option is very useful when someone need software_ecc. Thanks - Bryan Wu