From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ITFQh-0005jk-Hu for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:21:50 -0400 Subject: Re: General performance of NAND operations i.e mount and ls From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Konstantin Kletschke In-Reply-To: <20070906093735.GD2164@z1.synertronixx> References: <20070906081215.GA5693@anita.doom> <1189067241.14370.23.camel@sauron> <20070906084418.GC2164@z1.synertronixx> <1189069864.14370.34.camel@sauron> <20070906093735.GD2164@z1.synertronixx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:21:33 +0300 Message-Id: <1189077693.14370.60.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:37 +0200, Konstantin Kletschke wrote: > Okay, what would I roughly excpect on this system? >=20 > # time dd if=3D/dev/mtd4 of=3D/dev/null bs=3D4096 count=3D512 > 512+0 records in > 512+0 records out > real 0m 0.61s > user 0m 0.01s > sys 0m 0.61s > # time dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/mtd4 bs=3D4096 count=3D512 > 512+0 records in > 512+0 records out > real 0m 1.08s > user 0m 0.00s > sys 0m 1.08s Not sure about your system, but the hardware I worked with was ~8 times faster on read and ~3 times faster on write. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)