From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nwd2mail11.analog.com ([137.71.25.57]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1IVkS7-00085I-82 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:53:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blackfin BF54x NAND Flash Controller driver From: Bryan Wu To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0709130151p36846690w4600463837285a2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1188804323.29566.6.camel@roc-laptop> <20070913013702.d446739a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <8bd0f97a0709130145u474ab017ocf58b004c5d69dc0@mail.gmail.com> <1189673107.30686.18.camel@roc-desktop> <8bd0f97a0709130151p36846690w4600463837285a2b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:49:45 +0800 Message-Id: <1189673385.30686.20.camel@roc-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: bryan.wu@analog.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: bryan.wu@analog.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:51 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 9/13/07, Bryan Wu wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 04:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On 9/13/07, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:25:23 +0800 Bryan Wu wrote: > > > > > This is the driver for latest Blackfin BF54x nand flash controller > > > > > > > > > > - use nand_chip and mtd_info common nand driver interface > > > > > - provide both PIO and dma operation > > > > > - compiled with ezkit bf548 configuration > > > > > - use hardware 1-bit ECC > > > > > - tested with YAFFS2 and can mount YAFFS2 filesystem as rootfs > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > +int hardware_ecc = 0; > > > > > > > > scripts/checkpatch.pl, please. > > > > > > that isnt static so checkpatch.pl wouldnt have caught it ... it should > > > be static though of course and then checkpatch.pl would have thrown a > > > static init 0 warning :) > > > > Actually, it would caught by checkpatch.pl even without static. > > it doesnt for me, but maybe i'm just using an older version > -mike Yes, should use the latest git-tree checkpatch.pl Thanks -Bryan