From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: RE: getdents64 problem in 2.6.23 From: David Woodhouse To: Joakim Tjernlund In-Reply-To: <005201c819be$649f47e0$5267a8c0@Jocke> References: <005201c819be$649f47e0$5267a8c0@Jocke> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:26:45 -0400 Message-Id: <1193617605.2915.84.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 'Linux-MTD Mailing List' , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=27J=F6rn?= Engel' , 'Jamie Lokier' List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 00:58 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > David, before rewriting getdents et. all may I ask you to apply the > patch I sent today? Then we will have something that works and go > from there. I'm not happy about having fd->raw still pointing to nodes which may no longer exist. Can't we set it to NULL (and cope with potential fallout)? -- dwmw2