From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Iu2V7-0002vH-A3 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:01:11 -0500 Subject: Re: UBIFS - Current Status? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: "Johnson, Charles F" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:00:55 +0200 Message-Id: <1195462855.1119.2.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 14:42 -0700, Johnson, Charles F wrote: > Just curious on what the current state of UBIFS ?? =20 >=20 > I'm looking for a solution which could support very large MLC NAND flash > design. UBIFS+UBI looks like it a good candidate.=20 I wonder how large? --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)