From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JJWlq-0004F1-N0 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:23:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: introduce atomic LEB change ioctl From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <20080125152829.591def16@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20080124165453.30169.40332.sendpatchset@golum> <20080125152829.591def16@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:22:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1201537366.4262.2.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:28 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > Could you explain a bit more? What exactly does "atomic" mean? >=20 > This seems like it's similar to volume update, only on a LEB level > right? If so, could you make volume update just use this or somehow > combine them? >=20 > Maybe I've just been away from UBI too long. It sounds cool, but I > don't fully understand what the intention is. Josh, I've updated the UBI documentation in order to answer your question. Any documentation improvements and spelling fixes are welcome. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)