From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JROtV-0003wV-Gv for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:36:10 +0000 Subject: Re: ubi-utils: Moving mkpfi, pfiflash, ... to old-tools From: Artem Bityutskiy To: haver@vnet.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <1203353343.8085.48.camel@august> References: <1203342580.8085.23.camel@august> <1203353343.8085.48.camel@august> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:34:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1203413657.3758.25.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Artem B. Bityutskiy" , "Monte K. Copeland" , Andreas Arnez , MTD Mailinglist , Thomas Gleixner , Alexander Schmidt1 Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 17:49 +0100, Frank Haverkamp wrote: > I talked to Artem. He told me that the tools had deficiencies that > prevented him using them. E.g. that he could not put the vid-hdr the > offset he wanted it to put. He promissed me to write up the deficiencies > so that we can work on them. I am sure that after fixing, we can move > the tools back to their old location. >=20 > Of course it would be nice, if we could move the tools back even before > the fixup, to avoid changing our build scripts. Let us discuss that with > Artem tomorrow. I can return the tools to the state they were before I touched them, is it OK for you? --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)