From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JWTiF-0000xL-CK for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:45:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [UBI] add block device layer on top of UBI From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Nancy In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:40:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1204623622.23706.22.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:40 +0800, Nancy wrote: > Hi, > UBI block device layer's basic function finally OK now. >=20 > Please, replace the "ubi_new.diff" with "ubi_blk_ok.diff" >=20 > Next to do: > 1, fix ubi->ref_count > 2, when write a LEB, do not read the old mapped LEB to > write_cache, only read needed pages to hance speed. Hi, could you please send patches inline? It is what people normally do and it is easier to reply and comment the patches this way. Also, I do not think we need this common "blktrans" module for UBI at all, it just does not seem to make much sense. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)