From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JWTut-0001Z5-2y for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 09:58:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [UBI] add block device layer on top of UBI From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Nancy In-Reply-To: References: <1204623622.23706.22.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 11:53:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1204624414.23706.26.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 17:54 +0800, Nancy wrote: > How gonna you do to support VFAT ? In embended system world, this > function is very important. I do not mean the block translation layer is unneeded. It is ok and cool to create it. I mean we do not need any generic layer where you can register "block translation drivers", like mtd_blktrans. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)