From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Jf8Lh-00005Z-Qv for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:46:02 +0000 Subject: Re: mkfs.ubifs: device table support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Hamish Moffatt In-Reply-To: <20080328062402.GA31782@cloud.net.au> References: <20080328062402.GA31782@cloud.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:42:54 +0200 Message-Id: <1206686574.3856.66.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 17:24 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Are there any plans to add support for a device table in mkfs.ubifs, > similar to mkfs.jffs2, genext2fs etc? Not sure what is this for actually :-) Could you please elaborate? I glanced at mkfs.jffs2.c it does not look difficult, so we may implement it if you need - no problem. > Otherwise the image must be made as root or using fakeroot I think. Yeah, we usually generate rootfs images as root. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)