From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Jnwca-0004NJ-09 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:03:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] ubi and u-boot From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <1208785853.5965.388.camel@sauron> References: <20080420222237.4AE5324657@gemini.denx.de> <1208779508.5965.371.camel@sauron> <1208785463.6654.34.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <1208785853.5965.388.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:01:04 +0300 Message-Id: <1208786464.11721.0.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net" , Ricard Wanderlof , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 16:50 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 08:44 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I think there was only 1 time the on-flash format changed, and that was > > before UBI was merged upstream. New features can be introduced with > > additional flags, however older versions should be able to ignore those= . > >=20 > > Artem, is that right? My memory is fuzzy here. >=20 > No, this is not right. We never changed the media format since UBI was > merged. Err, I meant what you said is right, but it is not right that we changed media format. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)