From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Alexey Korolev <akorolev@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][patch] NAND partial page read functionality
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:11:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209021115.11721.107.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209018876.11721.100.camel@sauron>
Hi David, Thomas,
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:34 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 18:15 +0000, Alexey Korolev wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Here is a patch providing partial page read functionality for NAND
> > devices.
> >
> > In many cases it gives performacne boost. I've added this feature
> > enabling under chip->options flag.
> > Setting NAND_PART_READ option in board driver will enable this feature.
>
> Hamish, this stuff should certainly help you. You could give it a try.
> Unfortunately Alexey gave up almost straight away and did not try to
> push his work harder.The arguments against the patch were weak, and
> addressable. This work needs some more efforts and it may get merged.
> Moreover, Alexey came with impressive numbers, and it is difficult to
> argue against. Would you give it a try? If it gives performance benefits
> for you, I think we could raise this again.
>
> Look here for the full story:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2007-December/020105.html
Could we please take a look at this work:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2007-December/020105.html
and identify what should be changed/done to have it merged. Alexey shows
impressive numbers there. Also, Hamish(*) shows that UBI attach time drops
from about 5.6 seconds to about 2.5 seconds which is a very substantial
growth.
Thanks!
*) http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2008-April/021413.html
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-24 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-13 18:15 [RFC][patch] NAND partial page read functionality Alexey Korolev
2007-12-15 12:13 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-12-17 15:46 ` Alexey Korolev
2007-12-18 8:48 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-12-18 11:42 ` Jörn Engel
2007-12-18 12:57 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-12-18 13:51 ` Jörn Engel
2008-04-24 6:34 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-24 7:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2008-04-24 7:45 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-04-24 9:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-24 10:25 ` Alexey Korolev
2008-04-24 10:45 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-04-24 10:57 ` Alexey Korolev
2008-04-24 14:04 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-04-24 14:48 ` Alexey Korolev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1209021115.11721.107.camel@sauron \
--to=dedekind@infradead.org \
--cc=akorolev@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hamish@cloud.net.au \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox