From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: New thread [BUG] JFFS2 usage of write_begin and write_end functions causes kernel panic From: David Woodhouse To: James In-Reply-To: <1210312276.28139.19.camel@Ubuntu-Desktop> References: <1210312276.28139.19.camel@Ubuntu-Desktop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 09:12:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1210320731.25560.1193.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 15:51 +1000, James wrote: > I've just subscribed. I saw this in the archives and it matches > exactly what I'm seeing on an AT91SAM9263-EK board. I have 4 such > boards. 2 work ok, the other 2 exhibit this problem. I'm using > 2.6.24 + patches from linux4sam.org. I'm using soft ECC. There are > no bad blocks detected by U-boot. You possibly need the patch in commit abe2f4143? > I realise I should not have started a new thread, so is there a way I > could reply to a message on the list archive? The first link on the archived mail, despite appearing to be the address of the person who sent the mail, actually has a mailto: link which will send mail to the list -- and will get the threading right, if your MUA is behaving itself properly. -- dwmw2