From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JwHQ0-0003az-9Q for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 13:53:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [UBI] add block device layer on top of UBI From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Nancy In-Reply-To: References: <1204623622.23706.22.camel@sauron> <1204624414.23706.26.camel@sauron> <1210672391.5708.15.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:50:48 +0300 Message-Id: <1210773048.5708.83.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 21:31 +0800, Nancy wrote: > I though you must know the answer better than any others. Here's > your Big red note ... (snip) ... > In embended system world, this function is very important. mp3, Please, no need to send lengthy explanations like this. I have nothing agains a good FTL. In opposite, I think it would be nice to develop one. I just think the patches you send are not good enough and need more work if you want them to be merged upstream. > MTD and UBI should be family, Why the developers here are so ....? ... (snip) ... Please, no need to flame. Please, make technical arguments instead. Thank you! --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)