From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KBVHP-0006Ti-Ld for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:43:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD-UTILS] ubiformat: reverse question about vid offset change From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Bernard Blackham In-Reply-To: <20080625131723.GA24006@mersenne.largestprime.net> References: <20080625131723.GA24006@mersenne.largestprime.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:42:32 +0300 Message-Id: <1214401352.6573.24.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 21:17 +0800, Bernard Blackham wrote: > Users can pass the -O option to ubiformat to override the VID header > offset on the command-line. If for some reason, the new offset does > not match what is on flash, ubiformat currently prompts the user if > they'd rather use the *old* offsets. This means that calling > ubiformat with --yes will not do what was requested on the > command-line. >=20 > This patch reverses the question so --yes is actually useful for > running in batch-mode. Pushed, thank you! --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)