From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 2nd problem with read_subpage() ? From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Alexey Korolev In-Reply-To: <1217323810.3124.19.camel@sauron> References: <1217314432.3124.9.camel@sauron> <1217323810.3124.19.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:31:12 +0300 Message-Id: <1217323872.3124.21.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 12:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 09:53 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > Glance at nand_do_read_ops(): > >=20 > >=20 > > if (likely(sndcmd)) { > > chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_READ0, 0x00, page); > > sndcmd =3D 0; > > } >=20 > Alexey, >=20 > my investigation showed that this "random output" command is not > supported by all flashes. ST-micro NANDs seems to support it > (I checked 2 manuals), while Sumsung NANDs do not (checked manual > for K9XXG08UXA). This means your implementation will break many > systems and should be either fixed or reverted. Note, the Samsung NAND I referred is a large page device. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)