From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KW4Ui-0004m3-FJ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:22:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] use $(MAKE) rather than make From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Mike Frysinger In-Reply-To: <1219254725-21918-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1219254725-21918-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:20:14 +0300 Message-Id: <1219303214.18027.55.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 13:52 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > If you execute straight `make`, this prevents the active make env from > being passed on to sub children. This prevents parallel building as > well > as build flag passing. >=20 > I also dropped the recursive make in ubi-utils/Makefile for the all > target > as this causes problems when building in parallel. All of the targets > that we actually care about are handled by the $(NTARGETS) target > anyways. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger Thanks, applied on top of Sebastian's patch. Fixed conflicts. Please, check. --=20 >=20 > Best regards, > Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)