From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2][MTD] Add support for > 2GiB MTD devices From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Tim Anderson In-Reply-To: <000101c9080a$4ec3a6b0$6b01a8c0@mvista.com> References: <000101c9080a$4ec3a6b0$6b01a8c0@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:03:37 +0300 Message-Id: <1219817017.18027.149.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org, 'Bruce Leonard' , Bruce_Leonard@selinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, 'Andrew Morton' , 'David Woodhouse' Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 23:01 -0700, Tim Anderson wrote: > I have been experimenting with this. I think there is at least 3 maybe 4 > IOCTLS that are going to need to have a LARGE mode. The 2 most obvious ar= e > MEMGETINFO and MEMERASE. dwmw2 vetoed any MEMGETINFO ioctl changes, or new similar ioctls, and it kind of make sense, because we should use sysfs instead. But this, in turn, means implementing sysfs support for MTD, because MTD is not LinuxDeviceModel-enabled at the moment. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)