From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2][MTD] Add support for > 2GiB MTD devices From: David Woodhouse To: Tim Anderson In-Reply-To: <000201c9080d$0bce0d20$6b01a8c0@mvista.com> References: <000201c9080d$0bce0d20$6b01a8c0@mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:35:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1219818923.7107.106.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org, 'Bruce Leonard' , Bruce_Leonard@selinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, 'Andrew Morton' List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 23:20 -0700, Tim Anderson wrote: > I see your point. Ioctls are going away after all. > > So we should have something like: > /sys/class/mtd/mtd0/ > > Or just under device or platform? Tim, please stop top-posting. I'm not sure I'd say I _vetoed_ new ioctls, but I certainly expressed a desire to do all the information stuff through sysfs. We would need a new MEMERASE64 ioctl though. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation