* 8/16/32 bit JEDEC probe
@ 2008-09-12 22:03 Michel Stempin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michel Stempin @ 2008-09-12 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Hi list,
I have an interesting case to submit.
I have a SystemBase ARM9 (AT91SAM9260) Eddy-CPU-V2 that can be populated
with either a 32MB SST 39VF3201 (Mfr: 0x00bf, Id: 0x235b) or a 64MB EON
EN29LV640B (Mfr: 0x007f, Id: 0x22cb) part. Mine has the SST part.
As none of these chips were defined in jedec_probe.c, I defined them
there.
However, when the probe is done, an SST 49LF080A (Mfr: 0x00bf, Id:
0x005b) is found instead of my SST 39VF3201...
What is remarkable is that both chips have the same LSB Id!
My conclusion is that the less discriminating 8-bit device detection has
precedence over the more discriminating 16-bit device.
Shouldn't this be the other way around (ie. first detect 32, then 16,
then 8 bit devices)?
If I comment the SST 49LF080A definition, everything works as expected.
Best regards,
--
Michel Stempin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-09-12 22:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-12 22:03 8/16/32 bit JEDEC probe Michel Stempin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox