* mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
@ 2008-10-08 0:27 Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Davis @ 2008-10-08 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Hello,
I use buildroot to build my embedded Linux. My run-time library is
uClibc, which doesn't provide bcopy().
fec.c in mtd-utils uses bcopy(), so mtd-utils doesn't compile for me.
I'd like to fix this.
- Should I rewrite fec.c so it uses memcpy instead?
- Should I just add #define NEED_BCOPY to fec.c?
- Should I leave fec.c unchanged and add -DNEED_BCOPY to the Makefile
(which would be passed to every compile?)
http://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git?a=blob_plain;f=fec.c
Which solution would you guys accept?
Thanks,
Mitch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 0:27 mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy() Mitch Davis
@ 2008-10-08 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 2:36 ` Mitch Davis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-10-08 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mitch Davis; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 20:27, Mitch Davis wrote:
> I use buildroot to build my embedded Linux. My run-time library is
> uClibc, which doesn't provide bcopy().
actually it does. you just disabled support for it.
> fec.c in mtd-utils uses bcopy(), so mtd-utils doesn't compile for me.
> I'd like to fix this.
>
> - Should I rewrite fec.c so it uses memcpy instead?
> - Should I just add #define NEED_BCOPY to fec.c?
> - Should I leave fec.c unchanged and add -DNEED_BCOPY to the Makefile
> (which would be passed to every compile?)
a simple sed can fix the code as the only difference between bcopy()
and memcpy() is the argument order. ifdef's are pointless/ugly in
this case.
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-10-08 2:36 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 2:38 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Davis @ 2008-10-08 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: linux-mtd
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 786 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 20:27, Mitch Davis wrote:
>
>> fec.c in mtd-utils uses bcopy(), so mtd-utils doesn't compile for me.
>> I'd like to fix this.
>>
>> - Should I rewrite fec.c so it uses memcpy instead?
>> - Should I just add #define NEED_BCOPY to fec.c?
>> - Should I leave fec.c unchanged and add -DNEED_BCOPY to the Makefile
>> (which would be passed to every compile?)
>
> a simple sed can fix the code as the only difference between bcopy()
> and memcpy() is the argument order. ifdef's are pointless/ugly in
> this case.
I agree. I've attached a diff that makes this change.
It compiles with no warnings, but I have no way of testing it. Any
suggestions what to do next?
Thanks,
Mitch.
[-- Attachment #2: fec.diff --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 3975 bytes --]
[PATCH] [MTD] mtd-utils: fec.c: bzero->memset, bcopy->memcpy, bcmp->memcmp
This patch alters fec.c so it does not use the deprecated bzero, bcopy and bcmp
functions. This can help on platforms that do not have these functions.
From: Mitch Davis <mitch.davis@symstream.com>
Signed-off-by: Mitch Davis <mitch.davis@symstream.com>
diff --git a/fec.c b/fec.c
index 09e8453..6d9020f 100644
--- a/fec.c
+++ b/fec.c
@@ -47,19 +47,6 @@
#include <string.h>
/*
- * compatibility stuff
- */
-#ifdef MSDOS /* but also for others, e.g. sun... */
-#define NEED_BCOPY
-#define bcmp(a,b,n) memcmp(a,b,n)
-#endif
-
-#ifdef NEED_BCOPY
-#define bcopy(s, d, siz) memcpy((d), (s), (siz))
-#define bzero(d, siz) memset((d), '\0', (siz))
-#endif
-
-/*
* stuff used for testing purposes only
*/
@@ -433,7 +420,7 @@ invert_mat(gf *src, int k)
gf *id_row = NEW_GF_MATRIX(1, k);
gf *temp_row = NEW_GF_MATRIX(1, k);
- bzero(id_row, k*sizeof(gf));
+ memset(id_row, '\0', k*sizeof(gf));
DEB( pivloops=0; pivswaps=0 ; /* diagnostic */ )
/*
* ipiv marks elements already used as pivots.
@@ -513,7 +500,7 @@ found_piv:
* we can optimize the addmul).
*/
id_row[icol] = 1;
- if (bcmp(pivot_row, id_row, k*sizeof(gf)) != 0) {
+ if (memcmp(pivot_row, id_row, k*sizeof(gf)) != 0) {
for (p = src, ix = 0 ; ix < k ; ix++, p += k ) {
if (ix != icol) {
c = p[icol] ;
@@ -704,7 +691,7 @@ fec_new(int k, int n)
/*
* the upper matrix is I so do not bother with a slow multiply
*/
- bzero(retval->enc_matrix, k*k*sizeof(gf) );
+ memset(retval->enc_matrix, '\0', k*k*sizeof(gf) );
for (p = retval->enc_matrix, col = 0 ; col < k ; col++, p += k+1 )
*p = 1 ;
free(tmp_m);
@@ -731,10 +718,10 @@ fec_encode(struct fec_parms *code, gf *src[], gf *fec, int index, int sz)
sz /= 2 ;
if (index < k)
- bcopy(src[index], fec, sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
+ memcpy(fec, src[index], sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
else if (index < code->n) {
p = &(code->enc_matrix[index*k] );
- bzero(fec, sz*sizeof(gf));
+ memset(fec, '\0', sz*sizeof(gf));
for (i = 0; i < k ; i++)
addmul(fec, src[i], p[i], sz ) ;
} else
@@ -751,10 +738,10 @@ void fec_encode_linear(struct fec_parms *code, gf *src, gf *fec, int index, int
sz /= 2 ;
if (index < k)
- bcopy(src + (index * sz), fec, sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
+ memcpy(fec, src + (index * sz), sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
else if (index < code->n) {
p = &(code->enc_matrix[index*k] );
- bzero(fec, sz*sizeof(gf));
+ memset(fec, '\0', sz*sizeof(gf));
for (i = 0; i < k ; i++)
addmul(fec, src + (i * sz), p[i], sz ) ;
} else
@@ -814,12 +801,12 @@ build_decode_matrix(struct fec_parms *code, gf *pkt[], int index[])
for (i = 0, p = matrix ; i < k ; i++, p += k ) {
#if 1 /* this is simply an optimization, not very useful indeed */
if (index[i] < k) {
- bzero(p, k*sizeof(gf) );
+ memset(p, '\0', k*sizeof(gf) );
p[i] = 1 ;
} else
#endif
if (index[i] < code->n )
- bcopy( &(code->enc_matrix[index[i]*k]), p, k*sizeof(gf) );
+ memcpy(p, &(code->enc_matrix[index[i]*k]), k*sizeof(gf) );
else {
fprintf(stderr, "decode: invalid index %d (max %d)\n",
index[i], code->n - 1 );
@@ -870,7 +857,7 @@ fec_decode(struct fec_parms *code, gf *pkt[], int index[], int sz)
for (row = 0 ; row < k ; row++ ) {
if (index[row] >= k) {
new_pkt[row] = my_malloc (sz * sizeof (gf), "new pkt buffer" );
- bzero(new_pkt[row], sz * sizeof(gf) ) ;
+ memset(new_pkt[row], '\0', sz * sizeof(gf) ) ;
for (col = 0 ; col < k ; col++ )
addmul(new_pkt[row], pkt[col], m_dec[row*k + col], sz) ;
}
@@ -880,7 +867,7 @@ fec_decode(struct fec_parms *code, gf *pkt[], int index[], int sz)
*/
for (row = 0 ; row < k ; row++ ) {
if (index[row] >= k) {
- bcopy(new_pkt[row], pkt[row], sz*sizeof(gf));
+ memcpy(pkt[row], new_pkt[row], sz*sizeof(gf));
free(new_pkt[row]);
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 2:36 ` Mitch Davis
@ 2008-10-08 2:38 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 4:56 ` Mitch Davis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-10-08 2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mitch Davis; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 22:36, Mitch Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 20:27, Mitch Davis wrote:
>>> fec.c in mtd-utils uses bcopy(), so mtd-utils doesn't compile for me.
>>> I'd like to fix this.
>>>
>>> - Should I rewrite fec.c so it uses memcpy instead?
>>> - Should I just add #define NEED_BCOPY to fec.c?
>>> - Should I leave fec.c unchanged and add -DNEED_BCOPY to the Makefile
>>> (which would be passed to every compile?)
>>
>> a simple sed can fix the code as the only difference between bcopy()
>> and memcpy() is the argument order. ifdef's are pointless/ugly in
>> this case.
>
> I agree. I've attached a diff that makes this change.
>
> It compiles with no warnings, but I have no way of testing it. Any
> suggestions what to do next?
use `git diff` to generate a diff instead of posting the entire file
as an attachment. really you should use git to send the patch, but if
that's too much for you, just post the diff.
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 2:38 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-10-08 4:56 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 5:07 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Davis @ 2008-10-08 4:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: linux-mtd
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 22:36, Mitch Davis wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 20:27, Mitch Davis wrote:
>>>> fec.c in mtd-utils uses bcopy(), so mtd-utils doesn't compile for me.
>>>> I'd like to fix this.
>>>>
>>>> - Should I rewrite fec.c so it uses memcpy instead?
>>>
>>> a simple sed can fix the code as the only difference between bcopy()
>>> and memcpy() is the argument order. ifdef's are pointless/ugly in
>>> this case.
>>
>> I agree. I've attached a diff that makes this change.
>>
>> It compiles with no warnings, but I have no way of testing it. Any
>> suggestions what to do next?
>
> use `git diff` to generate a diff instead of posting the entire file
> as an attachment.
The diff I attached previously was generated by git diff from HEAD.
It was not the entire file.
> really you should use git to send the patch
Do you mean a git push? I'd need an account for that on infradead,
no? A pointer to some instructions would be great. Note, two of the
three links to informative articles on the MTD GIT HOWTO page are
broken. If you don't mean a git push, please tell me what you mean.
Hmm, I hope the following inline pasting doesn't break tabs, etc.
Thanks for your help,
Mitch.
[PATCH] [MTD] mtd-utils: fec.c: bzero->memset, bcopy->memcpy, bcmp->memcmp
This patch alters fec.c so it does not use the deprecated bzero, bcopy and bcmp
functions. This can help on platforms that do not have these functions.
From: Mitch Davis <mitch.davis@symstream.com>
Signed-off-by: Mitch Davis <mitch.davis@symstream.com>
diff --git a/fec.c b/fec.c
index 09e8453..6d9020f 100644
--- a/fec.c
+++ b/fec.c
@@ -47,19 +47,6 @@
#include <string.h>
/*
- * compatibility stuff
- */
-#ifdef MSDOS /* but also for others, e.g. sun... */
-#define NEED_BCOPY
-#define bcmp(a,b,n) memcmp(a,b,n)
-#endif
-
-#ifdef NEED_BCOPY
-#define bcopy(s, d, siz) memcpy((d), (s), (siz))
-#define bzero(d, siz) memset((d), '\0', (siz))
-#endif
-
-/*
* stuff used for testing purposes only
*/
@@ -433,7 +420,7 @@ invert_mat(gf *src, int k)
gf *id_row = NEW_GF_MATRIX(1, k);
gf *temp_row = NEW_GF_MATRIX(1, k);
- bzero(id_row, k*sizeof(gf));
+ memset(id_row, '\0', k*sizeof(gf));
DEB( pivloops=0; pivswaps=0 ; /* diagnostic */ )
/*
* ipiv marks elements already used as pivots.
@@ -513,7 +500,7 @@ found_piv:
* we can optimize the addmul).
*/
id_row[icol] = 1;
- if (bcmp(pivot_row, id_row, k*sizeof(gf)) != 0) {
+ if (memcmp(pivot_row, id_row, k*sizeof(gf)) != 0) {
for (p = src, ix = 0 ; ix < k ; ix++, p += k ) {
if (ix != icol) {
c = p[icol] ;
@@ -704,7 +691,7 @@ fec_new(int k, int n)
/*
* the upper matrix is I so do not bother with a slow multiply
*/
- bzero(retval->enc_matrix, k*k*sizeof(gf) );
+ memset(retval->enc_matrix, '\0', k*k*sizeof(gf) );
for (p = retval->enc_matrix, col = 0 ; col < k ; col++, p += k+1 )
*p = 1 ;
free(tmp_m);
@@ -731,10 +718,10 @@ fec_encode(struct fec_parms *code, gf *src[], gf
*fec, int index, int sz)
sz /= 2 ;
if (index < k)
- bcopy(src[index], fec, sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
+ memcpy(fec, src[index], sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
else if (index < code->n) {
p = &(code->enc_matrix[index*k] );
- bzero(fec, sz*sizeof(gf));
+ memset(fec, '\0', sz*sizeof(gf));
for (i = 0; i < k ; i++)
addmul(fec, src[i], p[i], sz ) ;
} else
@@ -751,10 +738,10 @@ void fec_encode_linear(struct fec_parms *code,
gf *src, gf *fec, int index, int
sz /= 2 ;
if (index < k)
- bcopy(src + (index * sz), fec, sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
+ memcpy(fec, src + (index * sz), sz*sizeof(gf) ) ;
else if (index < code->n) {
p = &(code->enc_matrix[index*k] );
- bzero(fec, sz*sizeof(gf));
+ memset(fec, '\0', sz*sizeof(gf));
for (i = 0; i < k ; i++)
addmul(fec, src + (i * sz), p[i], sz ) ;
} else
@@ -814,12 +801,12 @@ build_decode_matrix(struct fec_parms *code, gf
*pkt[], int index[])
for (i = 0, p = matrix ; i < k ; i++, p += k ) {
#if 1 /* this is simply an optimization, not very useful indeed */
if (index[i] < k) {
- bzero(p, k*sizeof(gf) );
+ memset(p, '\0', k*sizeof(gf) );
p[i] = 1 ;
} else
#endif
if (index[i] < code->n )
- bcopy( &(code->enc_matrix[index[i]*k]), p, k*sizeof(gf) );
+ memcpy(p, &(code->enc_matrix[index[i]*k]), k*sizeof(gf) );
else {
fprintf(stderr, "decode: invalid index %d (max %d)\n",
index[i], code->n - 1 );
@@ -870,7 +857,7 @@ fec_decode(struct fec_parms *code, gf *pkt[], int
index[], int sz)
for (row = 0 ; row < k ; row++ ) {
if (index[row] >= k) {
new_pkt[row] = my_malloc (sz * sizeof (gf), "new pkt buffer" );
- bzero(new_pkt[row], sz * sizeof(gf) ) ;
+ memset(new_pkt[row], '\0', sz * sizeof(gf) ) ;
for (col = 0 ; col < k ; col++ )
addmul(new_pkt[row], pkt[col], m_dec[row*k + col], sz) ;
}
@@ -880,7 +867,7 @@ fec_decode(struct fec_parms *code, gf *pkt[], int
index[], int sz)
*/
for (row = 0 ; row < k ; row++ ) {
if (index[row] >= k) {
- bcopy(new_pkt[row], pkt[row], sz*sizeof(gf));
+ memcpy(pkt[row], new_pkt[row], sz*sizeof(gf));
free(new_pkt[row]);
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 4:56 ` Mitch Davis
@ 2008-10-08 5:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 6:06 ` Mitch Davis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-10-08 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mitch Davis; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 00:56, Mitch Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> use `git diff` to generate a diff instead of posting the entire file
>> as an attachment.
>
> The diff I attached previously was generated by git diff from HEAD.
> It was not the entire file.
sorry, my mistake
>> really you should use git to send the patch
>
> Do you mean a git push?
no. use the send-email function. read `man git-send-email` for more info.
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 5:07 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-10-08 6:06 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 6:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Davis @ 2008-10-08 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: linux-mtd
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 00:56, Mitch Davis wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> use `git diff` to generate a diff instead of posting the entire file
>>> as an attachment.
>>
> sorry, my mistake
>
>>> really you should use git to send the patch
>>
>> Do you mean a git push?
>
> no. use the send-email function. read `man git-send-email` for more info.
- Who is best told about the broken git info links on the MTD git web page?
- This process of submitting stuff with git-send-email is not
documented on the MTD page, but newbies should use it anyway. Can I
suggest the howto on the MTD page be updated to avoid people like me
getting it wrong?
- On my machine (Fedora 9) git-send-email is part of the git-email
package, not standard git. Others may benefit from knowing this if
it's part of that updated page.
And finally:
- I've sent my diff twice already. Can you have a look at it and
comment please? :-)
Thanks heaps,
Mitch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 6:06 ` Mitch Davis
@ 2008-10-08 6:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-10-08 6:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 12:43 ` Josh Boyer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2008-10-08 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mitch Davis; +Cc: linux-mtd, Mike Frysinger
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 17:06 +1100, Mitch Davis wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 00:56, Mitch Davis wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> use `git diff` to generate a diff instead of posting the entire file
> >>> as an attachment.
> >>
> > sorry, my mistake
> >
> >>> really you should use git to send the patch
> >>
> >> Do you mean a git push?
> >
> > no. use the send-email function. read `man git-send-email` for more info.
>
> - Who is best told about the broken git info links on the MTD git web page?
>
> - This process of submitting stuff with git-send-email is not
> documented on the MTD page, but newbies should use it anyway. Can I
> suggest the howto on the MTD page be updated to avoid people like me
> getting it wrong?
> - On my machine (Fedora 9) git-send-email is part of the git-email
> package, not standard git. Others may benefit from knowing this if
> it's part of that updated page.
MTD web site source may be found at:
git://git.infradead.org/mtd-www.git
Please, feel free to add such a HOWTO and send a patch.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 6:06 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 6:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2008-10-08 6:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 12:43 ` Josh Boyer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2008-10-08 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mitch Davis; +Cc: linux-mtd
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 02:06, Mitch Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 00:56, Mitch Davis wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> really you should use git to send the patch
>>>
>>> Do you mean a git push?
>>
>> no. use the send-email function. read `man git-send-email` for more info.
>
> - This process of submitting stuff with git-send-email is not
> documented on the MTD page, but newbies should use it anyway. Can I
> suggest the howto on the MTD page be updated to avoid people like me
> getting it wrong?
> - On my machine (Fedora 9) git-send-email is part of the git-email
> package, not standard git. Others may benefit from knowing this if
> it's part of that updated page.
it's the same method as any git repo. there isnt anything specific
for the MTD project other than the e-mail address you send it to. if
you want to know about git and how to use it, you should go to the git
homepage:
http://git.or.cz/
> - I've sent my diff twice already. Can you have a look at it and
> comment please? :-)
i have no commit access, but i already gave the patch a quick eye over
and it looked fine to me. the b* suite of memory functions have long
been deprecated in favor of the mem* functions.
-mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy()
2008-10-08 6:06 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 6:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-10-08 6:23 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2008-10-08 12:43 ` Josh Boyer
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Josh Boyer @ 2008-10-08 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mitch Davis; +Cc: linux-mtd, Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 05:06:07PM +1100, Mitch Davis wrote:
> - I've sent my diff twice already. Can you have a look at it and
>comment please? :-)
Why do you use '\0' for the memcpy operand instead of just
plain 0 or 0x0?
josh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-08 12:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-08 0:27 mtd-utils: fec.c uses bcopy() Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 1:02 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 2:36 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 2:38 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 4:56 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 5:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 6:06 ` Mitch Davis
2008-10-08 6:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-10-08 6:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-10-08 12:43 ` Josh Boyer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox