From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1KpI8J-0005Il-PP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:46:28 +0000 Subject: Re: Understanding UBIFS flash overhead From: Artem Bityutskiy To: dsaxena@plexity.net In-Reply-To: <20081010210036.GA12173@trantor.hsd1.or.comcast.net> References: <20081010210036.GA12173@trantor.hsd1.or.comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:45:22 +0300 Message-Id: <1223883922.3395.62.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:00 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > I'm working on getting UBIFS going on the OLPC XO and am trying to > understand what I am seeing in regards to file system size.=20 BTW, consider to try new "bulk_read" mount option which may improve file read speed. The "no_chk_data_crc" might be considered as well. We'd be interested to get some digits from you to see whether "bulk_read" improves things for you. Please, read here: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D122276053307842&w=3D2 --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)