From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Kpl8Q-0001BL-UB for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:44:31 +0000 Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m9EEhkaB025602 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:44:27 -0500 Subject: Some more ubifs docs From: Artem Bityutskiy To: linux-mtd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:42:47 +0300 Message-Id: <1223995367.4029.6.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, because many people are confused about where is UBIFS used, I've added this piece of documentation: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html#L_raw_vs_ftl It also tries to answer the question like "what is better, FTL device + traditional FS or raw flash + UBIFS". Because some things may appear to be questionable, I'd ask people to take a look at this. Thanks. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)