From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH][nandsim] FIX RAM wasting via kmalloc From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Alexey Korolev In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:18:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1225091926.3833.2.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Alexey, On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 16:33 +0100, Alexey Korolev wrote: > Nandsim consumes ~2x more RAM than the density of simulated device.=20 > It becomes critical if we need to simulate 256MB NAND and run stress test= s=20 > on it. I'm applying your patch to our local tree, just to test it. But there is a trailing white-space. [dedekind@gollum ubifs-2.6]$ git-am nandsim Applying FIX RAM wasting via kmalloc .dotest/patch:64: trailing whitespace. * then kernel memory alloc runs writeback which goes to the FS warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors. :-) --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)