public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dmitry pervushin <dpervushin@gmail.com>
To: dedekind@infradead.org
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [UBI] 1/4 UBI volume notifications - UBI changes
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:50:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228938622.7622.60.camel@hp.diimka.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228818989.13686.172.camel@sauron>

On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 12:36 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:

Thanks for your review, my the only comment is inlined below.

[skipped]
> <snip>
> > +/**
> >   * ubi_get_device - get UBI device.
> >   * @ubi_num: UBI device number
> >   *
> > @@ -842,6 +870,8 @@ int ubi_attach_mtd_dev(struct mtd_info *mtd, int ubi_num, int vid_hdr_offset)
> >  			goto out_detach;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/* when processing uif_init, we already might want to open the volume */
> > +	ubi_devices[ubi_num] = ubi;
> >  	err = uif_init(ubi);
> >  	if (err)
> >  		goto out_nofree;
> 
> I do not understand this change. The point is to prevent anyone from
> opening the volume before it is completely initialized. What you do -
> you allow the volume to be opened while it is in the middle of
> initialization, which is wrong. E.g., what if the initialization fails
> at some point?
> 
> And this change does not seem to be relevant to this patch.
This change is absolutely needed :)
Well, the sequence of steps is as follows:
1. uif_init calls ubi_add_volume
2. ubi_add_volume notifies everyone about volume adding
3. (successful exit is not interested to us)
4. in case of errors reported by uif_init ubi_attach_mtd_dev calls
ubi_kill_volumes
5. ubi_kill_volumes calls ubi_free_volume, which notifies everyone about
volume deleting.

In current version, "notifies about volume adding" corresponds to
ubi_create_gluebi and "...deleting" means ubi_destory_gluebi"

Does this sound right? OK, then I am replacing ubi_create_gluebi with
notification, notification function tries to open new (just appeared)
volume... and fails, because ubi_open_volume tries to ubi_get_device.
It, in turn checks the "ubi_devices[ubi_num]" which is not filled yet.

So, I do insist on the change.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-10 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-08 17:59 [PATCH] [UBI] 1/4 UBI volume notifications - UBI changes dmitry pervushin
2008-12-09 10:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-10 19:50   ` dmitry pervushin [this message]
2008-12-11  6:07     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-11  9:25       ` dmitry pervushin
2008-12-11 19:20         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2008-12-15 11:13           ` dmitry pervushin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1228938622.7622.60.camel@hp.diimka.lan \
    --to=dpervushin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dedekind@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox