From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: Reuben Dowle <Reuben.Dowle@navico.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: UBIFS performance with no_chk_data_crc option
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:35:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233059712.7085.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <70F6AAAFDC054F41B9994A9BCD3DF64E08308B18@exch01-aklnz.MARINE.NET.INT>
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 13:09 +1300, Reuben Dowle wrote:
> It seems to me that enabling the no_chk_data_crc option actually causes
> SLOWER read performance. I get these results:
Reuben,
thanks for noticing this. We've fixed the issue. You may find the fix in
the linux-next branch of the ubifs-2.6.git tree:
commit 6f7ab6d458bbfc2f55d295fa3e6b9e69cdb1d517
Author: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Date: Tue Jan 27 16:12:31 2009 +0200
UBIFS: fix no_chk_data_crc
When data CRC checking is disabled, UBIFS returns incorrect return
code from the 'try_read_node()' function (0 instead of 1, which means
CRC error), which make the caller re-read the data node again, but using
a different code patch, so the second read is fine. Thus, we read the
same node twice. And the result of this is that UBIFS is slower
with no_chk_data_crc option than it is with chk_data_crc option.
This patches fixes the problem.
Reported-by: Reuben Dowle <Reuben.Dowle@navico.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
This patch has also been pushed to all UBIFS back-port git trees.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 0:09 UBIFS performance with no_chk_data_crc option Reuben Dowle
2009-01-27 12:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233059712.7085.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dedekind@infradead.org \
--cc=Reuben.Dowle@navico.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox