From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1LsFt0-0004OJ-6x for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:31:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] flash_eraseall: extra care if NOR flash is not BIT_WRITEABLE From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior In-Reply-To: <1237848138-18157-4-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> References: <1237848138-18157-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <1237848138-18157-4-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:30:55 +0300 Message-Id: <1239366655.3390.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 23:42 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > this is difficult because it depends on CONFIG_JFFS2_FS_WRITEBUFFER > So do you still support your patches? I think that if your patches a. do not break anything b. have at least some improvements, even if they do not work for all cases then we may just take them. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)