From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] [MTD] Add MEMERASE64 ioctl for >4GiB devices From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Kevin Cernekee In-Reply-To: References: <1239953416.3390.243.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:47:11 +0300 Message-Id: <1240210031.14298.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Linux MTD , David Woodhouse , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Cernekee wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Artem Bityutskiy > wrote: > > Kevin, are you going to re-send patches 2-4, taking into account > > Arnd's and Andrew's suggestions? > > For Arnd's suggestion, I posted a followup patch here: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-April/025269.html > > Andrew brought up two issues: [MTD] in the subject line, and > linewrapping. I am assuming that he fixed these himself since he > pulled all five patches (originals + followup) into the -mm tree. > > Should I fix and repost the set anyway? No, I just missed that patch. Pushed your patches to l2-mtd-2.6.git. Will ping dwmw2 about this. I also checked that your patches at least do not break MTD for UBI/UBIFS. Thanks. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)