From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [61.155.106.76] (helo=www.mid-fun.com)
	by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1MDU34-00054u-9p
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:53:37 +0000
Subject: Re: about ubifs
From: tommy <jiujin.hong@mid-fun.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090608013528.GI15426@shareable.org>
References: <1244204035.18630.0.camel@tommy-desktop>
	<71cd59b00906050542v72c228a0r883cef7795189fe9@mail.gmail.com>
	<1244206994.20718.7.camel@tommy-desktop>
	<71cd59b00906050704m650d9701q1012dc8b649d8d7f@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090608013528.GI15426@shareable.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:52:45 +0800
Message-Id: <1244425965.7627.0.camel@tommy-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

yes,i have do it !

thanks for all !

Tommy
On 一, 2009-06-08 at 02:35 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Corentin Chary wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, tommy<jiujin.hong@mid-fun.com> wrote:
> > > no,i didn't fsync when i close file !
> > >
> > > did ubifs driver can achieve "fsync" when user modify some file and
> > > close with save ?
> > 
> > For critical data, you need to call fsync to be sure the data is
> > stored on the flash.
> > There is also a "sync" option for ubifs, but this will hurt performance a lot.
> 
> That reminds me.
> 
> A filesystem-generic "sync-on-close" mount option would be handy for
> things like that.
> 
> Expecting users to call fsync from a shell script is probably a bit much
> in a lot of applications.
> 
> -- Jamie
>