From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233] helo=mgw-mx06.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MEemV-0001PR-AP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:33:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [MTD-UTILS] Unified reading from standard input and from file From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Jehan Bing In-Reply-To: References: <1244551983.5847.388.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A2E98BD.30704@orb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:32:21 +0300 Message-Id: <1244705541.5847.412.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:04 -0700, Jehan Bing wrote: > Use same code path for reading data (not the OOB) from either the > standard input or a regular file. > > Signed-off-by: Jehan Bing The patches look OK to me, but I do not have time to review them very really well. So would it please be possible to describe how you tested them to convince me they are ok? Then I'd push them to mtd-utils.git tree. Did you test writing with/without oob, from file/stdin, etc? Thanks! -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)