From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: Decrease I/O count in ubi_scan
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:14:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248178451.24676.9.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248175591-4592-1-git-send-email-corentincj@iksaif.net>
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 13:26 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote:
> Merge ec_hdr and vid_hdr read in one ubi_io_read()
> This result in a 25% speedup with nandsim, and 6%
> speedup on an AT91SAM9263 board with a 200Mo UBI volume.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/io.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/mtd/ubi/scan.c | 35 +++++++++++++------------
> drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h | 4 +++
> 3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Yeah, I did the same optimization some time ago:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2008-April/021311.html
Could you please take a look at those patches as well, and if they
are any better, use them or improve yours. I do not remember the
details, to be frank.
No one reported a significant improvement, so I dropped it.
nandsim improvement is not very interesting, but the AT91SAM9263 is.
Which flash is there? And why do you presume is the improvement -
just less calls to MTD or really less I/O? Note MTD usually caches
the last read NAND page, so usually this is not about less I/O.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-21 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-21 11:26 [PATCH] UBI: Decrease I/O count in ubi_scan Corentin Chary
2009-07-21 12:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2009-07-21 13:42 ` Corentin Chary
2009-07-21 14:15 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-21 14:22 ` Corentin Chary
2009-07-22 8:51 ` Corentin Chary
2009-07-22 8:55 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248178451.24676.9.camel@localhost \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=corentincj@iksaif.net \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox