From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [PATCH] OneNAND: Runtime badblock check support From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Amit Kumar Sharma In-Reply-To: References: <20090721025303.GA3693@july> <4A659ED4.9040702@gmail.com> <9c9fda240907210405p7d6982a5yc6db5eca42bfc1e@mail.gmail.com> <9c9fda240907211939ud11b9adiae68c076bfbbe36f@mail.gmail.com> <1248243590.24676.17.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:26:33 +0300 Message-Id: <1248251193.24676.34.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Kyungmin Park Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 13:42 +0530, Amit Kumar Sharma wrote: > implmentaing on flash bab block table will save our bbt > scan time but flash bbt table may go huge bceuase you have > to set full > mapping table and in big device it may be to huge. If it is huge, then doing any even one scanning is crazy anyway. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)